Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 10:01

Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Astronomers finally figured out how Pluto cools itself - Boy Genius Report
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Logitech Announces Two New Accessories for WWDC - MacRumors
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Heart in distress? 9 silent symptoms you shouldn’t overlook - Times of India
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Has anyone liked being made a cocksucker?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why did VP Vance decide to humiliate the President of Ukraine on national TV?
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Over a million people now have access to the gen-AI powered Alexa+ - TechCrunch
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
How to avoid age-related cognitive deterioration - EL PAÍS English